Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are widely used by law enforcement officers to assess whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. However, they are not always reliable. There are numerous factors that can impact the results, from the environment in which the tests are performed to the physical health of the individual being tested. Understanding why these tests may be inaccurate and how you can challenge their results is crucial—especially if you are facing DUI charges. This guide will explore the reliability of FSTs and offer insights on how to defend against their findings.
2025 Atlanta's Best - Defense Law Firm
BadAss Attorney
Best Lawyers In America
10 Consecutive Years Selected to Super Lawyers
AVVO Client's Choice
Best Lawyers Best Law Firms
What Are Field Sobriety Tests?
Field sobriety tests are a set of physical and mental exercises used by police officers to determine whether a driver is impaired. These tests are often conducted during a traffic stop when the officer suspects that the driver may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
The most common field sobriety tests include:
- Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test: This test involves the officer observing the movement of the driver’s eyes as they follow a moving object, such as a pen or flashlight. It is used to detect signs of alcohol impairment, specifically involuntary jerking of the eyes.
- Walk-and-Turn Test: In this test, the individual is asked to walk heel-to-toe in a straight line for nine steps, then turn around and return in the same manner. The officer looks for signs of balance and coordination issues.
- One-Leg Stand Test: The individual must stand on one leg for 30 seconds while counting out loud. The officer looks for signs of difficulty in maintaining balance or standing still.
These tests are designed to measure a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities. The theory is that alcohol impairs balance, coordination, and mental sharpness, which would make these tasks more difficult. However, while these tests are used in many cases, they are not foolproof.
Greg Willis has been successful at defending DUI cases (over 93.1% without a conviction)
He's the only lawyer in the State of Georgia to ever be recognized for all three of these accomplishments.
Received the Samurai Lawyer Award for having gone to jail for a total of 4 days in order to save his own client
Received the BadAss Lawyer Award for the biggest impact of all DUI lawyers in DUI defense in the country
Received the vote of Georgia Lawyers as a Superlawyer in DUI Law for 10 straight consecutive years
Why Are Field Sobriety Tests Unreliable?
Field sobriety tests are far from perfect and can be influenced by a wide range of factors. Although police officers are trained to administer these tests, the accuracy of the results can still be compromised. Below are some of the key reasons why field sobriety tests may not be reliable indicators of impairment:
1. Improper Administration of the Tests
For a field sobriety test to be valid, it must be administered properly. Officers need to follow specific procedures when conducting each test. For example, the walk-and-turn test requires the individual to perform it in a straight line, without interruptions or distractions. If the officer fails to properly explain the test or doesn’t follow the guidelines, the results can be skewed. Furthermore, the environment in which the tests are conducted plays a role in their accuracy. Uneven ground, poor lighting, or bad weather conditions can make it difficult for a person to perform the tests correctly—even if they are sober.
2. Physical or Medical Conditions
Certain physical or medical conditions can make it difficult for someone to pass a field sobriety test, even if they are sober. For instance, conditions like vertigo, inner ear infections, or neurological disorders can affect a person’s balance and coordination, which are critical aspects of these tests. Similarly, arthritis or other joint problems can make it painful to walk heel-to-toe, affecting the individual’s performance on the walk-and-turn test. Some individuals may also have other impairments, such as visual problems, that affect their ability to perform the HGN test accurately. These conditions may be unrelated to alcohol or drug impairment but can still lead to a failed sobriety test.
3. Nervousness and Anxiety
It’s important to remember that people react differently when placed in high-pressure situations. A driver who is nervous or anxious during the roadside test may struggle with balance or coordination, even if they have not consumed alcohol or drugs. The stress of the situation can result in shaky hands, difficulty following instructions, or nervous movements. Anxiety can also cause physical symptoms that mimic intoxication, such as sweating or rapid breathing, which could be misinterpreted by the officer as signs of impairment.
4. Environmental Factors
Many field sobriety tests are performed outdoors, often in less-than-ideal conditions. Factors such as poor lighting, uneven pavement, rain, snow, and even the type of shoes the driver is wearing can all impact performance. A person who is forced to take the tests on slippery ground or while wearing high heels may struggle, leading to unreliable results. If the officer doesn’t take these environmental factors into account, the test results may not reflect the true level of impairment (if any).
5. Subjective Interpretation of Results
The results of field sobriety tests are largely based on the officer’s observations. However, what one officer considers a sign of impairment, another might not. For example, slight swaying during the one-leg stand test might be interpreted by one officer as a sign of intoxication, while another might see it as a natural reaction to balancing on one leg for an extended period. This subjective interpretation can lead to inconsistent results. Additionally, human error can play a role in these subjective assessments.
Related Videos
Choosing a Georgia DUI Attorney
Defenses and Strategies to Defend a DUI Charge
Legal Implications of Field Sobriety Test Results
While field sobriety tests are often used as evidence in DUI cases, their results are not always conclusive. In fact, many defense attorneys argue that FSTs are not reliable indicators of impairment. There have been numerous cases where DUI charges were dismissed or reduced because of questionable field sobriety test results. If you are arrested for DUI and have taken a field sobriety test, it’s essential to understand that the results of that test may not be as damaging as they seem.
DUI defense attorneys can challenge the accuracy of FSTs in several ways, including:
- Highlighting procedural mistakes: If the officer did not administer the tests properly, this can weaken the prosecution’s case.
- Presenting medical evidence: If the defendant has a medical condition that could explain poor performance on the tests, this can help discredit the results.
- Questioning the officer’s observations: The subjective nature of FSTs allows for the defense to question the officer’s judgment and conclusions.
In many DUI cases, the evidence from field sobriety tests is just one part of the case. A skilled defense attorney will carefully examine the circumstances surrounding the arrest and look for any weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence.
What Can You Do If You Believe the FST Results Are Unreliable?
If you have taken a field sobriety test and believe the results were unreliable, there are several steps you can take to challenge the results and protect your rights:
Featured Case Results
Protecting a Professional License After a DUI and Refusal of a Blood Test
Result: DUI Dismissed with No Jail Time and No Loss of License
Challenging Admissibility of a .19 BAC Blood Test and Field Sobriety Evaluation
Result: No Jail Time, No DUI on Record, No License Suspension
1. Consult with an Experienced DUI Attorney
If you are facing DUI charges, the first thing you should do is consult with an experienced attorney. A knowledgeable DUI lawyer can review your case and determine whether the field sobriety test was administered correctly. They can also help you gather medical records or other evidence that supports your claim that the test results were inaccurate. Willis Law Firm offers a free consultation for those who have been arrested for DUI, and we can help you understand your legal options.
2. Question the Test Administration
An attorney will investigate whether the officer followed the proper procedures for conducting the FSTs. If the officer failed to administer the tests according to the guidelines, this can be used to argue that the results were compromised.
3. Provide Medical Evidence
If you have a medical condition that could have affected your performance on the field sobriety test, providing medical documentation may help explain the poor results. This can include notes from your doctor, medical records, or expert testimony from a medical professional.
4. Challenge the Officer’s Observations
Because FST results are based on an officer’s subjective interpretation, your attorney can challenge the officer’s observations. This can involve questioning the officer’s training, experience, and whether they followed proper procedures in evaluating the test results.
Field sobriety tests are not always an accurate reflection of a person’s level of impairment. From physical health conditions to environmental factors, there are many reasons why a driver might fail these tests despite being sober. If you are facing DUI charges and have taken a field sobriety test, it’s crucial to understand your rights and options. The results of these tests can be challenged in court, and an experienced DUI defense attorney can help you build a strong defense strategy.
If you or a loved one has been arrested for DUI, contact Willis Law Firm today for a consultation. Our team is experienced in defending individuals against DUI charges and challenging unreliable evidence, including field sobriety tests.